Included in this post is the original issue of Building Moscow (СтроительÑтво МоÑквы), in which the general planning schemes for the proposed “Green City†of Moscow were submitted. Contributors to this competition included some of the premier architects and city-planners of the day: Moisei Ginzburg and Mikhail Barshch of OSA, Nikolai Ladovskii of ARU (a splinter group of ASNOVA), and Konstantin Mel’nikov, who was more of an independent (his membership in the different avant-garde architectural societies of the day varied over time).
The plans were wildly ambitious, and, unfortunately, none of them were realized. Nevertheless, the ambition and utopianism of their proposals remain as fascinating and haunting today as ever. Haunting, because these plans were so crudely shoved aside by Kaganovich and the Stalinist bureaucracy — because the ideas survived as artifacts long after their potential for realization had passed, because their fantasy has since outlived history and continues to linger over it, like a ghost. Thus, the fact that these science fictions were discarded, placed on the Hegelian “slaughterbench of history,†did not mean that they altogether vanished without a trace. They survive, spectrally, as testaments to a society that could have been.
The extraordinary ambitions of the Soviet planners were declared unrealistic and impracticable. And indeed, given the Soviets’ technological and material limitations at that time, they may well have been impossible. But such a verdict has often been passed on past visions of the future, and utopian speculation in general. Yet the modernists who took part in this competition felt that such utopianism was not only warranted, but required by a revolutionary society like the Soviet Union. Under capitalism, they argued, utopianism was a waste of time and impossible to realize. Now that the October Revolution had overturned these social relations, however, utopia was at last realizable, and so fantastic visions of the future were at last justified.
In any case, this issue contains Ginzburg and Barshch’s reproduction of their famous Disurbanist scheme for the Green city, which they had first unveiled in an issue of Modern Architecture (Ð¡Ð¾Ð²Ñ€ÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð°Ñ€Ñ…Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÐºÑ‚ÑƒÑ€Ð°) a month before. It also includes Mel’nikov’s mysterious and intriguing proposals for a “Laboratory of Sleep,†an “Institution for the Transformation of the Perspective of Man,†and a “Sonata of Sleep.†Ladovskii’s project for “the rationalization of rest and socialist living†saw him experimenting with his notion of a parabolic city within the municipal limits of Moscow. The rationalization of rest and sleep were indeed very important when it came to the Green City; Le Corbusier mentioned over and over his delight at the Soviets’ abolition of the seven-day week, replaced now by a five-day cycle of working for four days and resting on the fifth.
Below is the original issue, digitized and restored to the best of my ability from the microfiche copy:
I enjoyed reading that lost history of Stalinist Russia.
The big picture is the decisions are based on “socialism in one country.” Socialist vision lost out to pragmatism.
I agree. And that’s what the architectural modernists in the Soviet Union really failed to realize. The still held on to the international vision, imagining an international style of avant-garde building that could be applied in every country. On the cover of all their journals from 1923-1932 read, Пролетарии вÑех Ñтран, ÑоединÑйтеÑÑŒ!! (Workers of the World, Unite!). Sometime around 1933 and 1934 that slogan was eventually dropped from all the journals, and just the title of the journal was given out, plainly.
Thank you for posting this. Do you know if anyone has translated the document into English? Also, do you know whether anyone has translated the book Housing by Moisei Ginzburg into Engish?
Hi Ross,
Your item – СтроительÑтво МоÑквы – (1930) – â„– 3 – seems to have gone missing.
N
PS Thanks for this post.