Some thoughts in closing
.
FolÂlowÂing the apÂpearÂance of my beÂlated reÂport on “conÂferÂence comÂmunÂism” a couple days ago, I reÂceived a numÂber of apÂpreÂciÂatÂive comÂments, e-mails, and replies. It would seem I wasn’t alone in my rather low opinÂion of these conÂferÂences. A few of the people who sent me notes to this efÂfect caught me genuÂinely off guard; it alÂways feels vinÂdicÂatÂing to know that othÂers agree with you.
PreÂdictÂably, however, the reÂsponses that came in from the speakÂers who acÂtuÂally parÂtiÂcipÂated in the event, esÂpeÂcially those who had been singled out for criÂtiÂcism, were less than apÂpreÂciÂatÂive. Some seemed to take it all quite perÂsonÂally — and one of them, George CicÂcarÂiÂello-MaÂhÂer, went so far as to deÂfriend me on FaceÂbook. Was a bit surÂprised by it, to be honÂest; I’d alÂways thought he had pretty thick skin, othÂerÂwise. For the most part, I think, I’d reÂfrained from the ad homÂinem atÂtacks and manÂaged to keep my reÂmarks strictly ad rem. Maybe he felt that by atÂtackÂing his creÂdenÂtials to speak on a givÂen subÂject, I was thereby inÂdirÂectly atÂtackÂing his charÂacÂter. This was not my inÂtenÂtion.
Either way, it’s not like it matÂters. I’d anÂtiÂcipÂated it anyÂway. Just goes to show you can’t please everyÂone. Continue reading