Representations of the
Russian Revolution
![SothebysImage](https://i0.wp.com/thecharnelhouse.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/sothebysimage.jpg?resize=440%2C458)
![portrait-of-zinoviev-1926 (1)](https://i2.wp.com/thecharnelhouse.org/2014/07/portrait-of-zinoviev-1926-11.jpg?resize=440%2C578&ssl=1)
![Ðнненков Каменев](https://i0.wp.com/thecharnelhouse.org/2014/07/d0b0d0bdd0bdd0b5d0bdd0bad0bed0b2-d0bad0b0d0bcd0b5d0bdd0b5d0b21.jpg?resize=440%2C620&ssl=1)
![Ris_8](https://i2.wp.com/thecharnelhouse.org/2014/07/ris_81.jpg?resize=440%2C633&ssl=1)
![](https://i2.wp.com/thecharnelhouse.org/2014/07/annenkov-iurii-pavlovich-georges-poster-design-for-rene-clairs-film-the-million-e1405913001885.jpg?resize=440%2C656&ssl=1)
Revolutionary silhouettes
.
The present book is made up of a series of articles written on various occasions about some of our comrades in the RCP.
I should begin with a warning that these are not biographies, not testimonials, not portraits, but merely profiles: it is their virtue and at the same time their limitation that they are entirely based on personal recollections.
In 1919 the publisher Grzhebin, whom I already knew and who had been recommended to me by Maxim Gorky, asked me to start writing my memoirs of the great revolution. I was soon able to deliver him the first — or more precisely the preliminary — volume, in which I attempted to acquaint the readers both with myself, as a point of reference in judging the rather more subjective aspects of my ‘chronicle’, and with the main dramatis personae of the revolution in so far as I knew them and in so far as a knowledge of their characters and the events of their pre-revolutionary lives seemed to me to merit further exposition.
That book, however, was overtaken by a strange fate. At a moment when circumstances precluded me from working on it and when I had become convinced that to write memoirs at a time when not a single event of the revolution had cooled down — we were still living in its very crucible — was simply impossible (Sukhanov’s multi-volume work on the revolution, among others, had already convinced me of this); at a time, as it seemed to me, when any premature description of those events without an adequate study of the documents would be too subjective and little more than essay-writing — it was then that Grzhebin, unknown to me, published the first volume of my proposed memoirs. He is apparently continuing to publish them abroad, entirely without my permission.
I think it essential to state these facts here, in order to avoid any misunderstanding about the nature of that book. Continue reading